Disarming and Removinng Hamas's Control Over Gaza and Ensuring Lasting Peace.
- Rafael Haar

- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
The Gaza Strip remains one of the most volatile regions in the world, largely due to the ongoing control exerted by Hamas. Despite claims that Hamas has stepped back from civilian governance, it continues to maintain a harsh and violent grip on security within Gaza. This reality complicates efforts to implement agreements and achieve peace. The challenge of disarming Hamas and other unlawful combatant groups is the critical obstacle to any stability.

Israel will no longer allow terrorist threats to accumulated military power on its border. In the past Israel used deterrence and periodically a "mow the lawn" tactic, elimating immentent threats. Oct 7, 2023 changed this paradigm. No longer will Israel permit military and threats of terror to manifest anywhere near its borders.
Israael now controls 70% of Gaza and the Egytian Gaza border as well as maritime access. Hamas is surely being cornered, those that chose to leave are may. This leaves Hamas in control of smaller and smaller territory and less of a population to control and use as human shields.
Understanding Hamas’ Role in Gaza
Hamas, is the "Palestinian" branch of the Muslim Brotherhood Islamist terrorist group. Hamas violently seized control of Gaza in 2007, after winning elections and subsequently ousting the Palestinian Authority. While it claims to have relinquished some civilian administrative duties, it continues to control security forces and military operations with an iron fist.. This dual role allows Hamas to enforce strict control over the population and suppress dissent through violent means.
Hamas maintains a substantial stockpile of weapons and continues launching attacks against Israel. This ongoing militarization undermines peace efforts and fuels the ongoing violence. The international community widely classifies Hamas as a terrorist organization, which complicates diplomatic engagement and aid delivery.
Why Disarming Hamas Is So Difficult
Disarming Hamas involves more than just collecting weapons. Several factors make this process extremely problematic:
Political Legitimacy: Hamas views its illegally armed status as essential to its political identity and survival. Disarmament would mean losing leverage against Israel and rival Palestinian factions.
Security Vacuum: Without Hamas’, Gaza risks descending into even more chaos.
External Support: Hamas receives funding and weapons from Iran, Turkey, Qatar and other external actors, making it difficult to cut off supplies.
These challenges mean that any disarmament plan must address security, and humanitarian concerns simultaneously.
The Impact of Armed Control on Gaza’s Civilians
The continued armed control by Hamas has severe consequences for Gaza’s residents:
Restricted Freedoms: The population faces strict surveillance, limited freedom of movement, and harsh punishments for dissent.
Hamas's tactic of using its controlled population as Human shields.
Economic Hardship: Military priorities divert resources away from economic development and infrastructure.
Human Rights Violations: Reports document abuses by Hamas security forces, including arbitrary arrests, torture and executions.
Cycle of Violence: Hamas's ongoing attacks leads to repeated Israeli military responses, fulfilling Hamas's goal of causing civilian casualties and destruction.
These conditions create a humanitarian crisis that fuels resentment and instability.
Attempts at Ceasefire and Their Limitations
Several ceasefire agreements have been brokered over the years, often mediated by Egypt, Qatar, and the United Nations. While these agreements temporarily reduce violence, they rarely address the root causes:
Ceasefires usually exclude disarmament of unlawful terrorist groups.
They often collapse due to violations by Hamas and other terrorists.
Humanitarian aid and reconstruction efforts are frequently delayed or blocked due to Israel's security priorities.
Without a credible plan to disarm and remove Hamas's iron fisted control over Gaza, a broader peace framework and a real ceasefire is impossible.





Comments